Stakeholders' Perspectives on Vocational Education Commercialization in Malaysia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.63385/ipt.v1i2.89Keywords:
Commercialization, Stakeholder Perspectives, Vocational EducationAbstract
Seven studies examining technical and vocational education in Malaysia present a multifaceted picture of commercialization from the perspective of industry stakeholders. Industry participants stress that aligning TVET curricula with market demands through collaborative curriculum design, work‐based learning, and strategic partnerships address skill gaps and supports workforce development. We searched across over 562 academic papers from the Semantic Scholar corpus, Web of Science, Taylor & Francis Online, Science Direct, Scopus (A&I), ERIC, ProQuest Dissertation & Google Scholar. We retrieved the 50 papers most relevant to the query. Papers were screened based on specific inclusion criteria, including geographic scope, commercialization focus, stakeholder perspective, study design, development outcomes, evidence base, commercialization content, and data source. Purposive sampling was used to ensure diverse representation of stakeholders by experience. Data were coded thematically using software such as NVivo, interpreted by identifying patterns across stakeholder groups, and validated through triangulation, member checking, and expert review to ensure credibility and reliability. In several accounts, such partnerships yielded practical training, knowledge transfer, and long‐term economic benefits, while government initiatives—such as incentive schemes and formal corporatist models, aim to boost industry engagement. At the same time, stakeholders highlight a range of challenges. Reports noted limited participation by certain corporate actors, difficulties arising from cultural differences, geographical mismatches, and divergent expectations between industry and TVET providers, as well as high-cost barriers that complicate resource allocation. Taken together, these findings portray TVET commercialization as a promising yet complex strategy for national development, one that depends on improved stakeholder engagement and robust collaboration frameworks.
References
[1]Zreik, M., 2024. Soft Power and Diplomatic Strategies in Asia and the Middle East. IGI Global: Hershey, PA, USA.
[2]Ahmid, S.S., Tiew, C.C., Abdullah, M.N.L.Y., 2023. The influence of innovative characteristics, work readiness, and vocational self-concept on employability of vocational college students. International Journal for Research in Vocational Education and Training. 10(3), 288–317.
[3]Brunetti, F., Matt, D.T., Bonfanti, A., et al., 2020. Digital transformation challenges: Strategies emerging from a multi-stakeholder approach. The TQM Journal. 32(4), 697–724.
[4]Kezar, A., Bernstein-Sierra, S., 2024. Commercialization of higher education. In Second Handbook of Academic Integrity. Springer: Cham, Switzerland. pp. 1867–1887.
[5]Cuong, N.H., Thuy, N.T., Thao, V.T.P., 2013. Current issues in global development: A case study of education commercialization via joint-programs between Vietnamese and overseas universities. In Proceedings of the SEAMEO International Conference in Education, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam, 20–21 June 2023.
[6]Rasmussen, E., Moen, Ø., Gulbrandsen, M., 2006. Initiatives to promote commercialization of university knowledge. Technovation. 26(4), 518–533.
[7]Brown, P., Lauder, H., 1996. Education, globalization and economic development. Journal of education Policy. 11(1), 1–25.
[8]Ball, S., 2004. Education for sale! The commodification of everything? Available from: https://nepc.colorado.edu/sites/default/files/CERU-0410-253-OWI.pdf
[9]Berkley, M., 2019. Berkley, M., 2019. The commodification of education and the threat to public schools. Honors Theses. 202.
[10]Hani, M.H.M., Ismail, A., Razali, S.S., et al., 2024. The Development of Digital Competence Model Among TVET Educators Towards Digitization: A Concept Paper. Journal of TVET and Technology Review. 2(1), 1–18.
[11]Rokeman, N.R.M., Kob, C.G.C., 2024. Exploring Determinants and Challenges of Job Satisfaction in Technical and Vocational Education and Training (TVET): A Systematic. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences. 14(7), 265–287.
[12]Othman, I.W., Mokhtar, S., Esa, M.S., 2022. The stages of national education system operation: Issues, rationale, and challenges for the Ministry of Education Malaysia (MOE) in facing post pandemic norms of COVID-19. International Journal of Education, Psychology and Counseling. 7(47), 616–638.
[13]Hassan, R., Foong, L.M., Ismail, A.A., 2019. TVET in Malaysia. Vocational Education and Training in ASEAN Member States: Current Status and Future Development. Springer: Singapore; pp. 109–132.
[14]Ridzuan, M.R., binti Abd Rahman, N.A.S., 2022. The analysis of the government policy on technical and vocational education and training (TVET) and the predicaments of TVET in Malaysia. International Journal of Humanities Technology and Civilization. 7(1), 53–58.
[15]Canton, H., 2021. Organisation for economic co-operation and development—OECD. The Europa Directory of International Organizations 2021. Routledge: London, UK; pp. 677–687.
[16]Carroll, P., Kellow, A., 2021. The OECD: A decade of transformation: 2011–2021. Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co KG.: Berlin, Germany.
[17]Ab Rahman, R., Ahmad, S., Hashim, U.R., 2018. The effectiveness of gamification technique for higher education students engagement in polytechnic Muadzam Shah Pahang, Malaysia. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education. 15(1), 1–16.
[18]Mohd Noor, N.H.H., Bakri, M.H., Wan Yusof, W.Y.R., et al., 2020. The impact of the bank regulation and supervision on the efficiency of Islamic Banks. The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business. 7(11), 747–757.
[19]Caulfield, T., Ogbogu, U., 2015. The commercialization of university-based research: Balancing risks and benefits. BMC medical ethics. 16, 1–7.
[20]Baycan, T., Stough, R.R., 2013. Bridging knowledge to commercialization: the good, the bad, and the challenging. The Annals of regional science. 50, 367–405.
[21]Frishammar, J., Lichtenthaler, U., Rundquist, J., 2012. Identifying technology commercialization opportunities: the importance of integrating product development knowledge. Journal of Product Innovation Management. 29(4), 573–589.
[22]Razak, C.S.A., Ab Hamid, S.H., Meon, H., et al., 2021. Two-step model for emotion detection on twitter users: a covid-19 case study in Malaysia. Malaysian Journal of Computer Science. 34(4), 374–388.
[23]Fravel, D.R., 2005. Commercialization and implementation of biocontrol. Annu Rev Phytopathol. 43(1), 337–359.
[24]McManus, J.H., 2009. The commercialization of news. In The Handbook of Journalism Studies. Routledge: London, UK; pp. 238–254.
[25]Gwarda-Gruszczyńska, E., 2010. Gwarda-Gruszczyńska, E., 2010. Determinants of Successful Commercialization Strategy. Enterprise in Modern Economy: Management Aspects. p. 53.
[26]Kotler, P., Keller, K.L., 2016. A Framework for Marketing Management. Pearson International Edition: London, UK.
[27]Ohmann, R., 2003. Politics of Knowledge: The Commercialization of the University, the Professions, and Print Culture. Wesleyan University Press: Middletown, CT, USA.
[28]Hsu, D.W., Shen, Y.-C., Yuan, B.J., et al., 2015. Toward successful commercialization of university technology: Performance drivers of university technology transfer in Taiwan. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 92, 25–39.
[29]Weckowska, D.M., 2015. Learning in university technology transfer offices: Transactions-focused and relations-focused approaches to commercialization of academic research. Technovation. 41, 62–74.
[30]Bessant, J.R., Tidd, J., 2018. Entrepreneurship. John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA.
[31]Kruachottikul, P., Dumrongvute, P., Tea-makorn, P., et al., 2023. New product development process and case studies for deep-tech academic research to commercialization. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship. 12(1), 48.
[32]Chesbrough, H., 2006. Open business models: How to thrive in the new innovation landscape. Harvard Business Press: Boston, MA, USA.
[33]Gans, J.S., Stern, S., 2003. The product market and the market for “ideas”: commercialization strategies for technology entrepreneurs. Research policy. 32(2), 333–350.
[34]Siegel, D.S., Waldman, D.A., Atwater, L.E., et al., 2003. Commercial knowledge transfers from universities to firms: improving the effectiveness of university–industry collaboration. The Journal of High Technology Management Research. 14(1), 111–133.
[35]Acs, Z.J., Audretsch, D.B., 1990. Innovation and small firms. MIT press: Cambridge, MA, USA.
[36]Ahmadinejad, M., 2020. Knowledge commercialization in agricultural higher education: A two-step approach to structural equation modeling. International Journal of Agricultural Management and Development. 10(2), 149–166.
[37]Bikard, M., Vakili, K., Teodoridis, F., 2019. When collaboration bridges institutions: The impact of university–industry collaboration on academic productivity. Organization Science. 30(2), 426–445.
[38]Sutianah, C., Sobandi, B., Yamin, A.A., et al., 2024. Increasing creativity, production innovation and commercialization through the new teaching factory model based on life skills. Jurnal Pendidikan Vokasi. 14(2).
[39]Dutta, S., 2018. Commercialization of education system in India: A close outlook to teachers’ and students’ perspective. International Journal of Research. 5(4), 780–800.
[40]Cai, J., Kosaka, M., 2024. Conceptualizing technical and vocational education and training as a service through service-dominant logic. Sage Open. 14(2), 21582440241240847.
[41]Okoye, K., 2013. Private-public partnership and technical vocational Education and training (TVET) in a developing economy. Arabian Journal of Business and Management Review (Oman Chapter). 2(10), 51.
[42]Batdi, V., Semerci, C., Aslan, A., 2018. A Meta-Analytic and Thematic Study Concerning the Effect of Inquiry Based Instruction on Learners' Achievement. Educational Policy Analysis and Strategic Research. 13(2), 51–68.
[43]Haddaway, N.R., Page, M.J., Pritchard, C.C., et al., 2022. PRISMA2020: An R package and Shiny app for producing PRISMA 2020‐compliant flow diagrams, with interactivity for optimised digital transparency and Open Synthesis. Campbell systematic reviews. 18(2), e1230.
[44]Atkins, D., Best, D., Briss, P., et al., 2004. GRADE working group. Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. 328, 1490.
[45]Haynes, S.N., O'Brien, W.H., 2000. Principles and practice of behavioral assessment. Springer Science & Business Media: New York, NY, USA.
[46]Bal, A.P., 2015. Skills of using and transform multiple representations of the prospective teachers. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences. 197, 582–588.
[47]Rus, R., Salisu, M., Hussain, M., et al., 2023. Systematic review of Malaysia technical and vocational education (TVET) sustainability framework to increase the marketability of graduates using PRISMA. Jurnal Kejuruteraan. 6(2), 51–63.
[48]Vinayan, G., Harikirishanan, D., Ling, S.M., 2020. Upskilling and reskilling the workforce via industry driven technical and vocational education and training: Strategies to initiate Industry/Institution partnership in Malaysia. Journal of Economic Info. 7(2), 94–103.
[49]Rahim, N.A., Kamin, Y., Saud, M.S.B., et al., (Eds.), 2021. Strategic Collaboration Framework Between Vocational Colleges and Automotive Industry in Peninsular Malaysia. In Proceedings of the 6th UPI International Conference on TVET 2020 (TVET 2020), Online, 16–17 September 2020.
[50]Ramlee, M., (Ed.), 1999. The role of vocational and technical education in the industrialization of Malaysia. In Proceedings of the International Vocational Education and Training Association Annual Conference, Ana Hotel, Sydney, Australia, 4–6, June 1999.
[51]Hussain, M.A.M., Zulkifli, R.M., Kamis, A., et al., 2021. Industrial engagement in the technical and vocational training (TVET) system. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research. 20(12), 19–34.
[52]Kamin, Y., Cartledge, D., Simkin, K., (Eds.), 2010. Work-based learning in Malaysia’s Community Colleges: Perceptions from Students, Lecturers, Training Partners and Employers. In Proceedings of the 19th National Vocational Education and Training Research Conference, Perth, Australia, 7–9, July 2010.
[53]Sappar, R., Hussain, M.A.M., Zulkifli, R.M., 2024. The Implementation of Collaborative Industry Practices in Malaysian Vocational Colleges. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development. 13(2).
[54]Hasmori, A.A., Yunos, J.M., Hamzah, R., et al., 2015. Revealed knowledge integration in National Dual Training System (NDTS): philosophy, issues, and challenges. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences. 204, 191–197.
[55]Amin, J., 2016. Quality assurance of the qualification process in TVET: Malaysia Country. The Online Journal for Technical and Vocational Education and Training in Asia. 7, 1–12.
[56]Black, S., 2024. “Who do you think they are?” Troubling how mental conceptions of TVET lecturers shape lecturer support interventions. Open Learning as a Means of Advancing Social Justice. 314–337.
[57]Khambule, N., 2019. Labour market perceptions of students at a Technical and Vocational Education and Training (TVET) college in Grahamstown, South Africa [Master’s Thesis]. Rhodes University: Eastern Cape, South Africa.
[58]Harikirishanan, D., 2024. A critical examination of forging ‘industry-driven’partnerships in Malaysian TVET institutions. Heriot-Watt University: Edinburgh, UK.
[59]Grainger, J., Bowen-Clewley, L., Maclean, S., 2016. Asia-Pacific's experience with national systems of TVET. Available from: https://www.cepal.org/sites/default/files/events/files/jenny_grainger.pdf
[60]Subramaniam, N., Aziz, F.A., 2023. Governance of TVET in Malaysia: Gaps and opportunities for researchers. TVET@ Asia. 16p. Available from: https://tvet-online.asia/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/nsubramaniam_faaziz_tvet20.pdf
[61]Mustapha, R., Hussain, M.A.M., 2022. Vocational education and training in Malaysia. In International Handbook on Education in Southeast Asia. Springer: Singapore; pp. 633–660.
[62]Mustapha, S.M., Abdullah, N., Devarajoo, K., et al., 2021. Embracing internationalization in gearing Malaysian higher education towards global education. Asian Journal of University Education. 17(4), 132–147.
[63]Ramly, I.B., 1994. The Development of'Bahasu Melayu'Among Multiracial Secondary School Students Through the Experiental-Appreciation Approach. Bangor University: Bangor, UK.
[64]Rahman, N.L.A., Mokhtar, M., Ali, D.F., 2022. Self-initiated professional development (SI-PD) elements for Malaysian vocational colleges’ TVET teachers using fuzzy Delphi method (FDM). Journal of Technical Education and Training. 14(1), 100–109.
[65]Vanderhoven, E., 2023. Unpacking the global apprenticeship agenda: a comparative synthesis of literature from international organisations in the education policy field. Globalisation, Societies and Education. 1–18.
[66]Powell, L., McGrath, S., 2019. Skills for human development: Transforming vocational education and training. Routledge: London, UK.
[67]Ramli, S.B., Omar, F.B., Dolah, J.B., et al., 2023. 2U2i AND WBL-BASED PROGRAMS STUDENT-CENTERED LEARNING EFFICACY IN MALAYSIAN HIGHER EDUCATION. Docens Series in Education. 4, 62–79.
[68]Powell, J.J., 2020. Comparative education in an age of competition and collaboration. Comparative Education. 56(1), 57–78.
[69]Lerman, R.I., 2019. Scaling apprenticeship to increase human capital. Expanding Economic Opportunity for More Americans. Aspen Institute: Washington, DC, USA. pp. 56–75.
PDF
