Leveraging Domain Practices to Improve Academic Literacy in Undergraduate Computing Students
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.63385/ipt.v1i2.58Keywords:
Domain Practices, Academic Literacy, Research Skills, Undergraduate, Mind MapAbstract
Undergraduate students often find the process of collating research results and producing structured written text from this difficult. Research suggests that those with a writing strategy and those who leverage visual modelling techniques to structure their research or writing had an advantage over those who did not. There are strong parallels here with the field of software engineering in terms of established processes and the use of visual models. We hypothesise that undergraduate computing students will adopt Mind Maps (a visual modelling technique) as a tool in their writing process. To explore this, we conducted first a survey to better understand students' attitudes towards academic research and also a practical intervention, involving mind-mapping their research proposals prior to writing their literature reviews and full research proposal.Our investigation indicates that mind maps can serve as effective intermediary tools for organizing concepts and structuring academic writing, with parallels observed between their use and formal modeling methods such as UML diagrams. Survey and intervention data demonstrated that students who engaged in mind-mapping prior to drafting research proposals exhibited measurable improvements in literature density and overall proposal quality, though participation was voluntary and potentially biased toward more motivated students. Nevertheless, because improvements were assessed against individual baselines rather than cohort-wide performance, the results substantiate the pedagogical value of mind mapping as a research-support strategy.
References
[1] Davies, W.M., 2008. Note quite right: Teaching students how to make better arguments. Teaching in Higher Education. 13(3), 327–340. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13562510802045352
[2] Davies, W.M., 2011. Concept mapping, mind mapping and argument mapping: What are the differences and do they matter? Higher Education. 62(3), 279–301.
[3] Head, A.J., 2007. Beyond Google: How do students conduct academic research? First Monday. 12(8), 1–10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v12i8.1998
[4] Head, A.J., Eisenberg, M.B., 2010. Truth Be Told: How College Students Evaluate and Use Information in the Digital Age. Project Information Literacy Progress Report: “Truth Be Told”. 1 November 2010. The Information School, University of Washington: Seattle, WA, USA. pp. 1–72. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2281485
[5] Torrance, M., Thomas, G.V., Robinson, E.J., 1994. The writing strategies of graduate research students in the social sciences. Higher Education. 27(3), 379–392.
[6] Alias, M., Suradi, Z., 2008. Concept mapping: A tool for creating a literature review. In Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Concept Mapping, Tallinn, Estonia & Helsinki, Finland, 22–25 November 2008; pp. 96–99.
[7] Ganobcsik-Williams, L., 2002. A Report on the Teaching of Academic Writing in UK Higher Education. Royal Literary Fund: London, UK. pp. 1–50.
[8] Lea, M.R., Street, B.V., 1998. Student writing in higher education: An academic literacies approach. Studies in Higher Education. 23(2), 157–173.
[9] Wingate, U., 2018. Academic literacy across the curriculum: Towards a collaborative instructional approach. Language Teaching. 51(3), 349–364. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444816000264
[10] Calvo, S., Celini, L., Morales, A., et al., 2020. Academic literacy and student diversity: Evaluating a curriculum-integrated inclusive practice intervention in the United Kingdom. Sustainability. 12(3), 1155. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su12031155
[11] Chiu, Y.L.T., Rodríguez-Falcón, O., 2018. Embracing diversity for attainment: An inclusive approach to the teaching of academic literacy. Journal of Academic Writing. 8(2), 36–47.
[12] Sommerville, I., 2011. Introduction. In: Sommerville, I. (ed.). Software Engineering, 9th ed. Addison Wesley: Boston, MA, USA. pp. 3–27.
[13] Sommerville, I., 2011. Software processes. In: Sommerville, I. (ed.). Software Engineering, 9th ed. Addison Wesley: Boston, MA, USA. pp. 27–55.
[14] Schach, S.R., 2007. The scope of object-orientated software engineering. In: Schach, S.R. (ed.). Object-Oriented Software Engineering, 1st ed. McGraw-Hill: New York, NY, USA. pp. 3–31.
[15] Sommerville, I., 2011. Agile software development. In: Sommerville, I. (ed.). Software Engineering, 9th ed. Addison Wesley: Boston, MA, USA. pp. 56–81.
[16] Boehm, B., Turner, R., 2003. Observations on balancing discipline and agility. In Proceedings of the Agile Development Conference, Salt Lake City, UT, USA, 25–28 June 2003; pp. 32–39.
[17] Kruchten, P., 2003. The Rational Unified Process: An Introduction, 3rd ed. Addison-Wesley: Boston, MA, USA. pp. 1–300.
[18] Beel, J., Gipp, B., Langer, S., et al., 2016. Research-paper recommender systems: A literature survey. International Journal on Digital Libraries. 17(4), 305–338. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00799-015-0156-0
[19] Bradshaw, Y.J., 2012. Open education resources and higher education academic practice. Available from: https://oro.open.ac.uk/37389/19/Bradshaw%20Younie%20Jones%20CWIS%20submitted%20v2.pdf
[20] Wilson, A., Rimpiläinen, S., Skinner, D., et al., 2007. Using a virtual research environment to support new models of collaborative and participative research in Scottish education. Technology, Pedagogy and Education. 16(3), 289–304.
[21] Beel, J., Gipp, B., Langer, S. et al., 2011. Docear: An academic literature suite for searching, organizing and creating academic literature. In Proceedings of the 11th ACM/IEEE Joint Conference on Digital Libraries, Ottawa, Canada, 13–17 June 2011; pp. 465–466. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/1998076.1998188
[22] Lopes, S.F., Castro, R., Arajo, S., 2018. A mind-mapping front-end for text writing. In Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE 16th International Conference on Industrial Informatics, Porto, Portugal, 18–20 July 2018; pp. 1–6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/INDIN.2018.8472047
[23] Buzan, T., 1983. Use Both Sides of Your Brain, 2nd ed. EP Dutton: New York, NY, USA. pp. 1–150.
[24] Zhang, Y.L., Xiao, S.J., Yang, X.B., et al., 2010. Mind mapping based human memory management system. In Proceedings of the 2010 International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Software Engineering, Wuhan, China, 10–12 December 2010; pp. 1–4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/CISE.2010.5676752
[25] Abdullah, A., Köylü Baydemir, S.E.K., 2017. A systematic review of research on mind mapping in EFL context. Journal of Social Humanities Sciences Research. 4(14), 1801–1811. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26450/jshsr.252
[26] Mahmud, I., Rawshon, S., Rahman, M.J., 2011. Mind map for academic writing: A tool to facilitate university level students. International Journal of Educational Science and Research. 1(1), 21–30.
[27] Twardy, C., 2004. Argument maps improve critical thinking. Teaching Philosophy. 27(2), 95–116.
[28] Naghmeh-Abbaspour, B., Rastgoo, V., 2020. Analysis to find out the effect of mind mapping technique on the writing skills of Iranian learning of English as a Foreign Language. Texto Livre. 13(2), 102–116. DOI: https://doi.org/10.35699/1983-3652.2020.24559 (in Portuguese)
[29] Bukhari, S.S.F., 2016. Mind mapping techniques to enhance EFL writing skill. International Journal of Linguistics and Communication. 4(1), 58–77.
[30] Al-Jarf, R., 2009. Enhancing freshman students' writing skills with a mind-mapping software. Conference proceedings of »eLearning and Software for Education« (eLSE). 5(1), 375–382.
[31] Saed, H.A., Al-Omari, H.A., 2014. The effectiveness of a proposed program based on a mind mapping strategy in developing the writing achievement of eleventh grade EFL students in Jordan and their attitudes towards writing. Journal of Educational Practice. 5(18), 88–109.
[32] Holland, B., Holland, L., Davies, J., 2004. An Investigation into the Concept of Mind Mapping and the Use of Mind Mapping Software to Support and Improve Student. CELT Learning and Teaching Projects 2003/04. University of Wolverhampton: Wolverhampton, UK. pp. 1–30.
[33] Pribaldi, B.A., 2018. Use of the concept mapping strategy to improve academic writing. In: Persichitte, K. A., Suparman, A., Spector, M. (eds.). Educational Technology to Improve Quality and Access on a Global Scale. Springer: Cham, Switzerland. pp. 273–285.
[34] Wangmo, T., 2022. Implementation of digital mind mapping tools to improve academic reading and summary writing. Journal for Research Scholars and Professional of English Language Teaching. 6(33), 1–18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.54850/jrspelt.6.33.002
[35] Larman, C., 2014. Requirements to design - iteratively. In: Larman, C. (ed.). Applying UML and Patterns, 3rd ed. Prentice Hall PTR: Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA. pp. 131–172.
[36] Kwon, S.Y., Cifuentes, L., 2009. The comparative effect of individually-constructed vs. collaboratively-constructed computer-based concept maps. Computers & Education. 52(2), 365–375. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2008.09.012
[37] Larman, C., 2014. Iterative, evolutionary, and agile. In: Larman, C. (ed.). Applying UML and Patterns, 3rd ed. Prentice Hall PTR: Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA. pp. 17–41.
[38] Kress, G., Van Leeuwen, T., 2020. Reading Images: The Grammar of Visual Design, 2nd ed. Routledge: London, UK. pp. 1–300.
[39] Mavers, D., Somekh, B., Restorick, J., 2002. Interpreting the externalised images of pupils' conceptions of ICT: Methods for the analysis of concept maps. Computers & Education. 38(1–3), 187–207.
[40] Durkin, K., Main, A., 2002. Discipline-based study skills support for first-year undergraduate students. Active Learning in Higher Education. 3(1), 24–39. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787402003001003
[41] Beltra, F., 2022. Comparing the quality of business decisions supported by alternative visualization platforms. In Proceedings of the UKSim-AMSS 24th International Conference on Modelling and Simulation, Cambridge, UK, 13 April 2022; pp. 1–7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5013/IJSSST.a.23.01.01
PDF
