Students’ Experiences of Group Work in an Online Early Childhood Education Course
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.63385/ipt.v1i3.111Keywords:
Online Education, Online Learning, Group Work, Student Perceptions, Group ProjectAbstract
Groupwork is one of the learning strategies used by educators to engage university students in active learning. University students, however, often perceive group work as overwhelming and as extra work. There is a need to investigate how students perceive working in groups in online learning environments, particularly in the context of the United Arab Emirates (UAE). This study investigates the experiences of female undergraduate students with online group work in an early childhood education course in a federal university in the UAE. A cross-sectional approach was employed using a study-specific questionnaire that was designed to solicit the perceptions of 31 female Emirati undergraduate students and their perspectives of group work that was part of an online course. The questionnaire included multiple-choice questions as well as open-ended questions. The analysis was conducted using descriptive statistics as well as content analysis. Results indicated that students generally held a positive attitude towards working in groups online. The most reported skills developed through online group work according to the participants were time management (88%) and teamwork (81%). Despite these benefits, students reported some challenges for working in online groups, the most important being low contributions (31%) and poor commitment (28%) from some team members. To address the challenges reported by students, the study suggests carefully designing online group assignments and projects to ensure maximum participation from all students. This includes using strategies such as explicitly educating students about the benefits of working in groups for skill development, scheduling regular check-up meetings, and ensuring timely and specific feedback is given to students.
References
[1] Akpan, V.I., Igwe, U.A., Mpamah, I.B.I., et al., 2020. Social constructivism: Implications on teaching and learning. Brock Journal of Education. 8(8), 49–56.
[2] Korzycka, M., Bójko, M., Radiukiewicz, K., et al., 2021. Demographic analysis of difficulties related to remote education in Poland from the perspective of adolescents during the COVID-19 pandemic. Annals of Agricultural and Environmental Medicine. 28(1), 149–157. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26444/aaem/133100
[3] Langegård, U., Kiani, K., Nielsen, S.J., et al., 2021. Nursing students’ experiences of a pedagogical transition from campus learning to distance learning using digital tools. BMC Nursing. 20, 1–10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-021-00542-1
[4] Trongtorsak, S., Saraubon, K., Nilsook, P., 2021. Collaborative experiential learning process for enhancing digital entrepreneurship. Higher Education Studies. 11(1), 137–147. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5539/hes.v11n1p137
[5] Bell, M., Smith, L., Vrazalic, L., 2013. Teaching in Transnational Higher Education. Routledge: London, UK. pp. 148–159.
[6] Deveci, T., 2015. Freshman students’ emotional intelligence and team-work satisfaction levels: A comparative study: Gender and nationality. Journal of Higher Education. 5(1), 35–43.
[7] Elmassah, S., Bacheer, S., James, R., 2020. What shapes students’ perceptions of group work: Personality or past experience? International Journal of Educational Management. 34(9), 1457–1473. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEM-11-2019-0401
[8] Mohammed, J., Pasha-Zaidi, N., 2014. Effective teamwork among female Emirati students. In Proceedings of the 2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Indianapolis, IN, USA, 15–18 June 2014; pp. 24–457. Available from: https://peer.asee.org/effective-teamwork-among-female-emirati-students (cited 4 July 2025).
[9] Pasha-Zaidi, N., Afari, E., Mohammed, J., et al., 2015. Gender based teams: Perceptions of team satisfaction and effectiveness among engineering students in the United Arab Emirates. International Journal of Engineering Education. 31(4), 953–966.
[10] Prabhakar, G.V., 2016. Teamwork in higher education: An exploratory study in a UAE university. Strategic Management Quarterly. 4(1), 16–40. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15640/smq.v4n1a2
[11] Lee, J., Osman, G., 2020. Students’ experiences and perceptions of online collaborative learning in higher education of Korea and the UAE. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education. 22(1), 1–18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17718/tojde.849870
[12] Situmorang, M.A., 2021. Students’ perception of using group work in English class. Journal of English Teaching. 7(1), 80–88. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33541/jet.v7i1.2302
[13] Rance-Roney, J.A., 2010. Reconceptualizing interactional groups: Grouping schemes for maximizing language learning. English Teaching Forum. 48(1), 20–26. Available from: https://americanenglish.state.gov/files/ae/resource_files/10-48-1-d.pdf (cited 4 July 2025).
[14] Bada, S.O., Olusegun, S., 2015. Constructivism learning theory: A paradigm for teaching and learning. Journal of Research & Method in Education. 5(6), 66–70.
[15] Gautam, K.K., Agarwal, R., 2023. The new generation teacher: teacher as a facilitator. International Journal of Creative Research Thoughts. 11(7), 2320–2882. DOI: http://doi.one/10.1729/Journal.35553
[16] Rannikmäe, M., Holbrook, J., Soobard, R., 2020. Social constructivism—Jerome Bruner. In: Science Education in Theory and Practice: An Introductory Guide to Learning Theory. Springer: Cham, Switzerland. pp. 259–275.
[17] Vuopala, E., Näykki, P., Isohätälä, J., et al., 2019. Knowledge co-construction activities and task related monitoring in scripted collaborative learning. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction. 21, 234–249.
[18] Wai, C., Kan, Y., Mei, F., et al., 2023. How students learn in small groups through online mode during the coronavirus pandemic: Descriptive narratives. Teaching and Learning in Nursing. 18, 281–285. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.teln.2022.12.003
[19] Chang, B., Kang, H., 2016. Challenges facing group work online. Distance Education. 37(1), 73–88. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2016.1154781
[20] Rezaei, A., 2017. Features of successful group work in online and physical courses. The Journal of Effective Teaching. 17(3), 5–22. Available from: https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1175769.pdf (cited 4 July 2025).
[21] Myers, T., Blackman, A., Andersen, T., et al., 2014. Cultivating ICT students’ interpersonal soft skills in online learning environments. Journal of Learning Design. 7(3), 38–53. Available from: https://researchonline.jcu.edu.au/35368/ (cited 4 July 2025).
[22] Dissanayeke, S.R., Lewis, R., Swindells, S., 2024. Designing an innovative digital group work assignment to foster employability: An adaptable hybrid approach for the COVID-19 pandemic and beyond. Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and E-Learning. 39(2), 132–149. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02680513.2024.2307623
[23] Jacobs, B., Taljaard-Swart, H., Marx-Pienaar, N., et al., 2023. Preparing students for the future workplace: how online teaching and learning during the COVID-19 pandemic hone required transferable skills. Education + Training. 65(10), 81–97. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/ET-09-2022-0371
[24] Carr, S.E., Wilson, T.E., Slone, S.A., et al., 2024. Assigned group work is associated with increased student motivation and perceptions of belonging in an asynchronous online physiology laboratory course. Advances in Physiology Education. 48(3), 593–602. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00064.2024
[25] Garratt-Reed, D., Roberts, L.D., Heritage, B., 2016. Grades, student satisfaction, and retention in online and face-to-face introductory psychology units: A test of equivalency theory. Frontiers in Psychology. 7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00673
[26] Kelly, A.E., Clinton-Lisell, V., Klein, K.A., 2022. Enhancing college students’ online group work perceptions and skills using a utility-value intervention. Online Learning. 26(5). DOI: https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v26i3.2807
[27] Konak, A., Kulturel-Konak, S., Cheung, G.W., 2018. Teamwork attitudes, interest, and self-efficacy between online and face-to-face information technology students. Team Performance Management: An International Journal. 25(5/6), 253–278. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/TPM-05-2018-0035
[28] Cheng, E.W.L., 2017. Students working online for group projects: A test of an extended theory of planned behaviour model. Educational Psychology. 37(9), 1044–1056. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2016.1150424
[29] Favor, J.K., Kulp, A.M., 2015. Academic learning teams in accelerated adult programs: Online and on campus students’ perceptions. Adult Learning. 26(4), 151–159. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1045159515596928
[30] Lowes, S., 2014. How much “group” is there in online group work? Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks. 18(1). DOI: https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v18i1.373
[31] Koh, M.H., Hill, J.R., 2009. Student Perceptions of Groupwork in an Online Course: Benefits and Challenges. International Journal of E-Learning & Distance Education. 23(2), 69–92. Available from: https://ijede.ca/index.php/jde/article/view/477 (cited 4 July 2025).
[32] Hiromori, T., 2024. Group work dynamics and the role of leadership in face-to-face and online second language classes. International Journal of Applied Linguistics. 34(1), 316–332. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ijal.12495
[33] Hysaj, A., Hamam, D., Baroudi, S., 2021. Efficacy of group work in the online platform: An exploration of multicultural undergraduates’ attitudes in online academic writing classes. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, Washington, DC, USA, 24–29 July 2021; pp. 246–256.
[34] Donelan, H., Kear, K., 2018. Creating and collaborating: Students’ and tutors’ perceptions of an online group project. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning. 19(2), 37–54. DOI: https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v19i2.3124
[35] Goñi, J., Cortázar, C., Alvares, D., et al., 2020. Is teamwork different online versus face-to-face? A case in engineering education. Sustainability. 12(24), 10444. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su122410444
[36] Alhrahsheh, R., Ivanova, G., Aboutaleb, A., et al., 2022. Teamworking and concern for standards as part of employability readiness of the UAE students’ personality. Journal of Social Studies Education Research. 13(4), 188–208.
[37] Hammar, C., 2014. Group work as an incentive for learning – students’ experiences of group work. Frontiers in Psychology. 5, 558. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00558
[38] Pienaar, J., Wu, P., Adams, N., 2016. Development of virtual teamwork skills for distance students through simulated global virtual team projects. Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice. 124(1). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EI.1943-5541.0000252
[39] Bächtold, M., Roca, P., De Checchi, K., 2023. Students’ beliefs and attitudes towards cooperative learning, and their relationship to motivation and approach to learning. Studies in Higher Education. 48(1), 100.
[40] Burdett, J., Hastie, B., 2009. Predicting satisfaction with group work assignments. Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice. 6(1), 70–81. DOI: https://doi.org/10.53761/1.6.1.7
[41] Chang, Y., Brickman, P., 2018. When group work doesn’t work: Insights from students. CBE Life Sciences Education. 17(3). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.17-09-0199
[42] Morgan, K., Williams, K.C., Cameron, B.A., et al., 2014. Faculty perceptions of online groupwork. The Quarterly Review of Distance Education. 15(4), 37–41. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Bruce-Cameron-3/publication/275332967_faculty_perception-of-online-group-work/links/5537a7ab0cf2058efdeaca8c/faculty-perceptions-of-online-group-work.pdf (cited 4 July 2025).
PDF
