South Korea’s Growth Trajectory: High Performance with a Profit Share Below One-Third in Emerging and Advanced Economies
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.63385/jemm.v1i3.281Keywords:
GDP Growth, Employment Growth, Profit Share, Growth Model, Emerging EconomiesAbstract
What is the growth model of emerging economies striving to develop rapidly to become advanced economies? South Korea is the only poor economy, sixty years ago, to have become an emerging economy and then an advanced economy. For advanced economies since 1961, a new growth and distribution model has been proposed to explain the increase in the profit share of income and, simultaneously, the significant decline in GDP growth and labor productivity. Macroeconomic developments in South Korea are analyzed in detail, with standardized data available since 1975. It appears that high GDP and productivity growth are also associated with a low profit share, less than one-third over the long period from 1975 to 2019, as was the case for advanced economies during the Golden Age of Capitalism. South Korea is also the only advanced economy since the 2008 financial crisis to maintain high GDP and productivity growth. The considered growth and distribution model provides important insights both for advanced economies and for an emerging economy becoming an advanced economy like South Korea. For rapid economic growth, the key factors appear to be a low profit share, well below one-third, income-led growth, reduced inequality, and high R&D spending.
References
[1] Bhaduri, A., Marglin, S., 1990. Unemployment and the Real Wage: The Economic Basis for Contesting Political Ideology. Cambridge Journal of Economics. 14(4), 375–393. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.cje.a035141
[2] Marglin, S.A., Bhaduri, A., 1990. Profit Squeeze and Keynesian Theory. In: Nell, E.J., Semmler, W. (eds) Nicholas Kaldor and Mainstream Economics. Palgrave Macmillan: London, UK. pp. 123–163.
[3] Storm, S., Naastepad, C.W.M., 2017. Bhaduri-Marglin Meet Kaldor-Marx: Wages, Productivity, and Investment. Review of Keynesian Economics. 5(1), 4–24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4337/roke.2017.01.02
[4] Lorenzi, J-H., Villemeur, A., 2023. Global Theory of Growth and Distribution. Economica: Paris, France. pp. 1–320.
[5] Villemeur, A., 2023. Growth as a Chain Reaction: Its Production Function, the Three Growth Regimes and the Advanced Economies. Revue d’Economie Politique. 133(5), 653–691. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3917/redp.335.0653
[6] Villemeur, A., 2025. A Model of Maximum Employment Growth with a One-Third Profit Share. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics. 75, 403–422. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strueco.2025.08.013
[7] Cobb, C.W., Douglas, P.H., 1928. A Theory of Production. American Economic Review. In Supplement, Papers and Proceedings of the Fortieth Annual Meeting of the American Economic Association. American Economic Association: Pittsburgh, PA, USA. pp. 139–165.
[8] Bernanke, B.S., Parkinson, M.L., 1991. Procyclical Labor Productivity and Competing Theories of the Business Cycle: Some Evidence from Interwar U.S. Manufacturing Industries. Journal of Political Economy. 99(3), 439–459. Available from: https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/epdf/10.1086/261761 (cited 20 August 2025).
[9] Piketty, T., 2014. Capital in the Twenty-First Century. The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press: Cambridge, MA, USA.
[10] Koen, V., André, C., Beom, J., et al., 2021. South Korean focus areas: Sustaining the miracle on the Han River. Available from: https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/korean-focus-areas_f91f3b75-en/sustaining-the-miracle-on-the-han-river_103653fa-en.html (cited 20 August 2025).
[11] SaKong, I.I., Koh, Y., 2010. The Korean Economy: Six Decades of Growth and Development. South Korea Development Institute: Seoul, Republic of Korea.
[12] Crotty, J., Lee, K.K., 2005. The Causes and Consequences of Neoliberal Restructuring in Post-Crisis Korea. In: G. Epstein (ed.). Financialization and the World Economy. Edward Elgar: Gloucestershire, UK. pp. 334–353.
[13] Crotty, J., Lee, K.K., 2002. A Political-Economic Analysis of the Failure of Neoliberal Restructuring in Post-Crisis South Korea. Cambridge Journal of Economics. 26 (5), 667–678. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/cje/26.5.667
[14] Crotty, J., Lee, K.K., 2009. Was the IMF-Imposed Economic Regime Change in South Korea in the Wake of the 1997 Crisis Justified. The Political Economy of the IMF Intervention. Review of Radical Political Economics. 41(2), 149–169. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0486613409331422
[15] Koo, J., Kiser, S.L., 2001. Recovery from a Financial Crisis: The Case of South Korea. Economic & Financial Review. Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas: Dallas, TX, USA.
[16] Lee, K.K., 2024. Korea’s Economic Growth and the Growth Model in the Changing Global Economy. The Japanese Political Economy. 50(2), 161–184. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/2329194X.2024.2325981
[17] Akizhanov, K.B., 2023. Finance Capitalism and Income Inequality in the Global Economy: A Comparative Study of the USA, South Korea, Argentina and Sweden. Palgrave Macmillan: London, UK. pp. 1–228.
[18] Guschanski, A., Onaran, Ö., 2017. Why Is the Wage Share Falling in Emerging Economies? Industry Level Evidence. University of Greenwich: London, UK. pp. 1–40.
[19] Park, J., Mah, J.S., 2011. Neo-Liberal Reform and Bipolarisation of Income in Korea. Journal of Contemporary Asia. 41(2), 249–265. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00472336.2011.553044
[20] Lee, K.K., 2017. Income-Led Growth: Theory, Empirics and Debates in South Korea. Fiscal Study. 10(4), 1–43. Available from: https://kiss.kstudy.com/Detail/Ar?key=3563635 (cited 20 August 2025). (in Korean)
[21] Joo, S., Lee, K.K., Nah, W.J., et al., 2020. The Income-Led Growth in South Korea: Status, Prospects and the Lessons for Other Countries. Korea Institute for International Economic Policy: Seoul, Republic of Korea. pp. 1–225.
[22] Lavoie, M., Stockhammer, E. (eds.), 2013. Wage-Led Growth: An Equitable Strategy for Economic Recovery. Palgrave Macmillan: London, UK. pp. 1–170.
[23] Onaran, Ö., Galanis, G., 2014. Income Distribution and Growth: A Global Model. Environment and Planning A. 46(10), 2489–2513. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1068/a46265
[24] Palley, T.I., 2012. The Rise and Fall of Export-Led Growth. Investigación Económica. 71(280), 141–161. Available from: https://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?pid=S0185-16672012000200006&script=sci_arttext (cited 20 August 2025).
[25] Berg, A., Ostry, J.D., Tsangarides, C.G., et al., 2018. Redistribution, Inequality, and Growth: New Evidence. Journal of Economic Growth. 23(3), 259–305. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10887-017-9150-2
[26] The Committee of Income-Led Growth, 2018. Shared Prosperity in South Korea and Understanding Income-Led Growth in South Korea Correctly. The Committee of Income-Led Growth: Seoul, Republic of Korea. (in Korean)
[27] Kaldor, N., 1972. The Irrelevance of Equilibrium Economics. The Economic Journal. 82(328), 1237–1255. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2231304
[28] Schumpeter, J.A., 1911. Die Theorie der Wirtschaftlichen Entwicklung. Duncker and Humblot: Berlin, Germany. pp. 1–548.
[29] Schumpeter, J.A., 1942. Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy. Harper and Row: New York, NY, USA. pp. 1–431.
[30] Keynes, J.M., 1964. The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money. Macmillan Publishers: London, UK. pp. 1–403.
[31] Ricardo, D., 1817. On the Principles of Political Economy and Taxation. John Murray: London, UK. pp. 1–580.
[32] Barro, R.J., Sala-I-Martin, X., 1995. Economic Growth. McGraw-Hill: New York, NY, USA. pp. 1–539.
[33] Harrod, R.F., 1939. An Essay in Dynamic Theory. Economic Journal. 49(193), 14–33. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2225181
[34] Harrod, R.F., 1948. Towards a Dynamic Economics. Macmillan: London, UK. pp. 1–174.
[35] Domar, E.D., 1947. Expansion and Employment. American Economic Review. 37(1), 34–55. Available from: https://www.jstor.org/stable/1802857 (cited 20 August 2025).
[36] European Commission, 2024. Annual Macro-Economic Database (AMECO). European Commission: Brussels, Belgium.
[37] European Commission, 2001. Report No. 73. European Commission: Brussels, Belgium.
[38] World Bank, 2025. World Development Indicators (WDI). World Bank: Washington, DC, USA.
Downloads
PDF
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Alain Villemeur
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
